Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 vs Sunseeker X7 Gen 2

The Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 is the better robot mower, 8.5/10 against 7.9/10. It wins on navigation and coverage, terrain, value.

Sunseeker X7 Gen 2

7.9/10$2,599

Score by dimension

Dimension (weight)Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000Sunseeker X7 Gen 2
Navigation and coverage (25%)10.0●9.3
Terrain (20%)10.0●8.9
Value (15%)7.5●6.6
Setup and app (15%)8.08.0
Owner reputation (15%)5.05.0
Security and weather (10%)9.5●8.5

Specs side by side

SpecMammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000Sunseeker X7 Gen 2
Price$2,109●$2,599
Max area3,000 m² (0.75 acre)3,035 m² (0.75 acre)●
Max slope80%●70%
NavigationLiDAR + RTKRTK + camera
Boundary wireNot neededNot needed
RTK base stationRequiredRequired
DriveAWDAWD
Cutting width40 cm●35.6 cm
Runtime150 minNot confirmed
Noise56 dB●60 dB
Water ratingIPX6 (robot, charging station, RTK station)IPX5

Pick the Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 if

  • You have slopes steeper than 70%.
  • You want to spend less. It costs $490 less.
  • Quiet matters: 56 dB against 60 dB.

Pick the Sunseeker X7 Gen 2 if

  • Your lawn is closer to 3,035 m² than 3,000 m².

Related comparisons

Questions people ask

Is the Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 better than the Sunseeker X7 Gen 2?

The Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 scores 8.5/10 against 7.9/10 for the Sunseeker X7 Gen 2 on our spec-based score.

Which handles slopes better, Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 or Sunseeker X7 Gen 2?

The Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 is rated for 80% slopes, against 70% for the other.

Which covers a bigger lawn?

The Sunseeker X7 Gen 2, rated for 3,035 m² (0.75 acre).

Do they need a boundary wire?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000: no. Sunseeker X7 Gen 2: no.